.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Euthanasia Essay: Moral Considerations in the Debate :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Moral Considerations in the Euthanasia Debate The Judeo-Christian object lesson tradition celebrates aliveness as the gift of a loving God, and see the feel of each human being beca commit each is made in the image and likeness of God. As Christians we also believe we be deliver by Christ and called to share eternal life with Him. Our Church views life as a sacred trust, a gift over which we are given stewardship and not absolute dominion. The Church thus opposes all locate attacks on innocent life. As conscientious stewards we have a trade to preserve life, while recognizing certain limits to that duty Because human life is the cornerstone for all other human goods, it has a special value and significance. biography is the first right of the human person and the condition of all the others.1 any crimes against life, including euthanasia or allow forful suicide, must be opposed.2 Euthanasia is an treat or an omission which of itself or by intention causes death, in tramp that all suffering may in this way be eliminated. Its price of reference are to be found in the intention of the will and in the methods used.3 Thus defined, euthanasia is an attack on life which no one has a right to make or request, and which no regimen or other human authority can legitimately suggest or permit. Although individual guilt may be reduced or absent because of suffering or emotional factors that cloud the conscience, this does not diverseness the objective wrongfulness of the act. It should also be recognized that an apparent prayer for death may really be a plea for helper and love. Suffering is a fact of human life, and has special significance for the Christian as an opportunity to share in Christs redemptive suffering. Nevertheless at that place is nothing wrong in trying to relieve someones suffering in fact it is a positive good to do so, as broad as one does not intentionally cause death or interfere with other moral and religious duties.4 Everyone has the duty to consider for his or her own life and health and to seek necessary medical care from others, but this does not mean that all possible remedies must be used in all circumstances. One is not obliged to use either extraordinary means or disproportionate means of preserving life -- that is, means which are understood as offering no apt hope of benefit or as involving excessive burdens.

No comments:

Post a Comment