Obeying The Law Essay

A kind structure is mandatory for the pick of humans. Mans natural affinity for evil and conflict has been or so since the dawn of time until high society was accommodateed through the introduction of integritys. Without faithfulness, the impartiality and stability of high companionship would diminish completely. As a strong guidance of determinism, Thomas Hobbes believes that a strict giving medication is the tho government agency to social stability.Hobbes believed that a state of reputation wiz without a form of government would basic onlyy be a contend of all against all. This life would b atomic number 18ly be worth living due to the inherent evil nature of some human organisms selfishness, desperation and greed are the factors that define the war of all against all state. Hobbes thought that people bequeath violently get by in order to secure the basic necessities of life or for strong gains that people would compete and challenge early(a)s out of fear to ensure personalised unhazardousty and to earn a glorified reputation so as to deter others from challenging us.Without some form of leadership, laws and government every whizz would be in a state of universal insecurity dominated by fear. charge those who arent selfish or cowardly those who are inherently entire would be curb selfishly and cowardly in order to secure their safety. They would subscribe no chore, for example, attacking a potential threat if it would earn them a reputation of someone who shouldnt be messed with. In the words of Hobbes the disgust of bad men also compels good men to entertain recourse, for their profess protection, to the virtues of war, which are violence and fraud.Laws have arisen in society as a instruction for the government to take control to prevent negative deportment from citizens in a society. Many behaviours have had a negative scratch associated with them due to religious beliefs and historically, laws were introduced as a means of preventing this unwanted, unacceptable behaviour. Issues of the past, no matter how un obligatory they may sound, posed a problem at one point or a nonher and were dealt with the introduction of laws. Ancient Babylons earliest law was a simple philosophy an eye for an eye, a overlyth for a tooth. Roman laws consisted of such things as Whenever someone makes a clump promise or sells property, then according to law, that promise moldiness be carried out or if anyone sings abusive songs about somebody else, he shall be put to death.Another law was more conditional If anyone flaws somebody elses limb and does not apologize, then the other man go off contri exactlye the front mans limb in return. This law was conditional based on an apology. A uniform effective code was first introduced for the whole Roman Empire and issues were dealt with through lawyers and a judge Canadian legal code is loosely based on these principles. Even today, in that respect are some ridi culous laws that may await unnecessary in Canada, such as You cant drag a deadened horse down Yonge St. on a Sunday or having the burnish of house and garage doors being regulated by city bylaws. twain those laws seem irrelevant to social norms in Canada, but they posed a threat at one point or another.Laws are first harmonic means of protection and ownership for everyone within society. They enforce fair and twin interposition of all citizens in society. The goal of the law is to ensure that at that place is fairness to all and thoice. Justice is only achieved through equal treatment to every member in society and that is why there are strict laws with the punishment for each crime being the same. If punishments varied for 2 murderers who commit the exact same form of murder then one of them would be done an injustice something which is unacceptable in society. The law must(prenominal) treat every group and every individual equally to maintain order in society.As well as maintaining order, the law and the resembling punishments for pulling it have many purposes. For a start, the main purpose of the law is the remove the dangerous person the criminal from society. Removing the offender not only ensures the safety of individuals in society, but it, in a sense, teaches the offender a lesson. An optimistic view is that the offender go out realize that they have been caught and will learn that they can no longer get past with that detail form of crime. This, of course, is rarely the side. The view of the offender is parklandly that Ive been caught I have to be more careful. This is where the next benefit of the punishment comes in. In cases such as homicide or forms of sadistic violence the point of punishment is an effort to rehabilitate the offender to teach the offender that what they did was ill-treatfulness not because they got caught, but because many people were affected by it and it is an unacceptable way to behave in society.Da ngerous Offender legislation is a anthesis example of the benefits of rehabilitation. Its goal is to keep anyone deemed a Dangerous Offender, usually the sickest, close to sadistic and twisted criminals, imprisoned until they show psychological improvement unheeding of their sentence. A third goal of the law is to deter individuals from committing crime. That is, regular citizens will realize that there are severe penalties for committing a crime and that get caught is very common and therefore decide that committing a crime is too risky and not commit it. Severe punishments are required in conjunction with common arrest rates in order to efficaciously deter potential criminals.Children are socialized to obey the law from a very young age. Parents are responsible for teaching babyren rules and morals which they must obey. This is the same principle as the law. If a child breaks a rule, that child is punished. If a person breaks a law, that person is punished. When children are old full to break the law and be punished for it, they know what is right and wrong due to moral guidance. Even those without natural intuition of what is right or wrong Natural Law know not to break the law due to the punishments they endured as a child for breaking rules.Being obedient of the law is something that is required of all citizens, not only because of the consequences that follow, but because of the societal order that is maintained by having everyone obey the law. If one person gets away with breaking the law, no matter how miniscule the punishment may be, other people will get the impression that this law is not enforced or that is very easy to get away with and continue to break it. A prime example of this is seen with marijuana legislation. Many people have smoked, or continue to smoke marijuana regularly, making it more common and therefore more acceptable in society. Although society appears to accept it more, it doesnt mean that marijuana isnt harmful or i nsalubrious to a persons well-being. Various drugs could potentially be argued as a lifestyle choice and left up to the individual using them, but this is not the way society should be governed.Laws are imposed for a reason and drugs are illegal because they harm the user, even if its willfully. in that respect is no way to govern responsible drug use, especially when it comes to direct vehicles. Breaking any law has an overall negative effect on society. Stealing from even the largest farm animal, such as Wal-Mart, will have a negative effect on everyone. Not only does the owner of the store lose their merchandise, money and time, those who shop at Wal-Mart may experience a surge in prices on the stolen item.This is due to the owner needing to make up for the lost profit of the stolen goods. Some may follow the principle that one person committing an action such as stealing has no detrimental effect, but if everyone followed that principle, the store would go out of business due to theft and all the good Samaritans who didnt steal and paid for their goods would again be losing out for something they had nothing to do with. Those laws which are no longer necessary will phase out of law naturally, such as it being illegal to drag a dead horse down Yonge St. on a Sunday no longer posing a problem in Canada.If Canada were to suddenly remove its government, society would be in a chaotic state. People would be free to loot, plunder, kill and perform heady acts with no one to stop them. Everyones rights would indispensablely be taken away. No one would have the right to life. This poses yet another marvel is it ever okay to break the law? Take the scenario of a famished mother who must steal to feed her family. In this case, it may seem okay to break the law. But this is only because this mother cannot support her family and essentially they are being denied the right to life guaranteed to them by law. This situation seems alternatively paradoxical, as she is breaking the law to uphold the law. In times of desperation, where the well-nigh basic human right is being denied or impaired, it is okay to break the law. When survival is necessary, any human would break the law as is the case of self-defense scenarios. This is why sentencing is flexible. While the law is very strict, the sentencing may be lowered on conditions such as why the crime was perpetrate and the situation of the criminal.A final question to pose is does the law support justice? Justice is defined as the principle of moral shade equity. But the problem with this definition is that morals are commonly innate by person. Obviously, there are many things that are objectively wrong including murder, but there are many moral grey spots. found upon who is asked, speeding on the highway may be a proscribed to one person, but be perfectly okay to another. Its safe to say that justice is the act of maintaining order in a way that benefits and affects everyone in the same way in regards to law. Laws that put restrictions on a specific group or individual are not just because they limit the rights of certain individuals. According to this principle, the law is just. It maintains order in society while treating all individuals equally without reference to their sex, age, ethnicity and/or cultural and religious beliefs. So long as the law treats everyone equally, including those in power, the law can be considered just.The law is a major part of society that is apply to maintain order. Before the imposition of a leader and specific guidelines, society was in a state of chaos no one was protected and everyone lived in a state of universal insecurity. With the introduction of a legal system and laws, society has been governed in a peaceful way and criminals have traditionally been dealt with in a way that was accepted by all members of society. Even ancient societies, such as the Babylonians and the Romans used laws to sustain order and to ensure that justice was done. The law has been, and will continue to be an essential part of all societies. Without a legal system, the value of society would be reduced to nothingness and the integrity of humans would be absent from the world.